Loki (
doeswhathewants) wrote in
poly_chromatic2012-06-30 07:46 am
Entry tags:
Permavideo
I, for one, welcome this influx of visitors. Say, are any of you clever souls up for a game of three card monte?
[OOC: Anything goes on 4th wall day!]
[OOC: Anything goes on 4th wall day!]

no subject
no subject
Suppose two men at cards with nothing to wager save their lives. Who has not heard such a tale? A turn of the card. The whole universe for such a player has labored to this moment which will tell if he is to die at that man's hand or that man at his. What more certain validation of a man's worth could there be? This enhancement of the game to its ultimate state admits no argument concerning the notion of fate. The selection of one man over another is a preference absolute and irrevocable and it is a dull man indeed who could reckon so profound a decision without agency or significance in either one. In such games as have for their stake the annihilation of the defeated the decisions are quite clear. This man holding this particular arrangement of cards in his hand is thereby removed from existence. This is also the nature of war whose stake is at once the game and the authority and the justification. Seen so, war is the truest form of divination. It is the testing of one's will and the will of another within that larger will which because it binds them is therefore forced to select. War is the ultimate game because war is at last a forcing of the unity of existence.
But we are not speaking of war. No. You could say things could turn out another way. But there are no other ways.
Things are this way.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
What do you keep?
no subject
What I earn. What other people value, but cannot hold on to.
no subject
no subject
Maybe you do. Most people think they do, but then their confidence is their downfall.
no subject
no subject
no subject
What is it you do?
no subject
Did no one ever tell you it is quite rude to answer a question with a question. No? Well it is.
no subject