allinhishands: (Smirk)
Alexis Hargreaves ([personal profile] allinhishands) wrote in [community profile] poly_chromatic2012-03-24 03:37 pm

Anonymous Text

I greet you fondly, dear City, as I begin this message.

It has come to my attention that there are those that are not so fond of the lengths that some will go to in order to achieve a goal. There are questions that rise from it and suddenly warnings are posted. Of course, I am sure that some of you would consider it to be teasing instead. Alas, it is but a point of view in the end.

Yet, this brings up a question of my own: What lengths would you go to in order to achieve your greatest goal?

Were someone to ask me, I would say that there are no boundaries. Honestly, why should there be? If we allow some limitation then is our goal really worth achieving? I am sure there are plenty that wouldn't agree with this.

However, I know there are others that find a certain pleasure in the freedom that comes with killing. With harming another and watching his or her face contort in pain. I must admit that there is a release that I can achieve through this. The passion and thrill that comes from the pure sadistic nature of causing another pain really cannot be compared to anything else. At least, that is my personal opinion.

So, dear City, are you someone who will cause pain? Or are you someone that will fight against this to save those in pain? I am looking forward to your responses.

Fondly,
M.O.C.

[ooc: All responses from Alexis will be anonymous. He's currently checking out the morals of the people in the City.]
sympathyforme: (marked)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-24 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
More than it's true of. But I am curious, too.
sympathyforme: godDAMNit that collar (in all seriousness)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-24 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I doubt your imagination covers that much. But you might be right regardless.

Where are your boundaries?
sympathyforme: you can't touch this (indifference)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-24 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Careful, you'll end up in hell.
sympathyforme: who'd not want to meet me? (please allow me to introduce myself)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-24 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't recommend it, it's a sinking ship.
sympathyforme: next I'll be a pirate! (devil ninja)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-24 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
What use has hell when it can't be contrary anymore?
sympathyforme: (feel my distain)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-24 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
People fear the idea, not hell itself. They blame the concept, not the actual devil.
sympathyforme: I'll be damned, but I'm classy (man of wealth and taste)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-25 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
It doesn't hold any power then. In the end, it's just a construct.

To go back to your original question; So is morality.
sympathyforme: who'd not want to meet me? (please allow me to introduce myself)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-26 06:30 am (UTC)(link)
Yes? Must be how I got something of a following.
sympathyforme: (look pretty)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-26 06:34 am (UTC)(link)
Not so much. More from selling those ideas.
sympathyforme: (marked)

text; filtered

[personal profile] sympathyforme 2012-03-26 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Definitely true. The course of the world, ruled by charisma rather than any logic or reason.

Much less morals.